Please familiarise yourself with the forum, including policy on feature requests, rules & guidelines
workergray
About
- Username
- workergray
- Location
- Gulfport, Florida
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,233
- Last Active
- Roles
- Beta Tester
- Points
- 18
- Location
- Gulfport, Florida
- YouTube
- https://plus.google.com/u/0/101877774339986443123
- Music Streaming Link (if applicable)
- https://soundcloud.com/workergray
- Music Download Link (if applicable)
- https://www.reverbnation.com/workergray
- Posts
- 222
- 3
- Badges
Comments
-
Another consideration is: the sampler plays directly from the SD card. If you're playing a song with samples, you DON'T eject the disk to add more-- you wait. Granted, it's probably a rare circumstance to need to load new samples on to the card whi…
-
This is a copy of a post that got deleted. A lot of people voted on it.
-
Just a suggested usage.
-
32 people want this. I hope you're not suggesting they couldn't figure out the SD card. As to what priority it has, I'll leave that to the Synthstrom Audible team. if you don't like the suggestion, you don't have to vote for it. And commenting on …
-
you could have a whole set in one song-- each track is a resampled song and you could x-fade between them
-
Sure! Why not?
-
Of course-- "we" don't care if it waits a cycle for the effect to kick-in-- do we?
-
Found it: Rohan Hill-Deluge firmware beta tester, 11-22-2017 8:06PM The way that stutter works is that, whatever "speed" it's at, it'll wait until it's "sampled" one whole cycle of its buffer before then beginning to play that buffer bac…
-
That's the reason it hadn't been initially implemented, but I don't think they were necessarily opposed to it as a feature-- I guess they figured it was something that could wait until it was demanded.
-
It was over a year ago that I heard that, Amiga-- but I'm pretty sure it was Rohan.
-
I don't care about Ableton export, but a mixdown feature would be nice.
-
the stutter effect requires some "lead time" to get audio into the buffer-- this is why it currently "can't" be automated-- but that only matters on the first bar of audio. I don't care if it doesn't work right on the first bar, personally-- as long…
-
Drawing custom curves on the pads for envelopes would be handy. This VST has some interesting ideas that could certainly be implemented:
-
The more I think about it, the more important this feature becomes to me. I've been watching those "TastyChips GR-1" videos-- and the possibilities of granular sampling are INCREDIBLE. I think this should be 2.1 material. HUGE.
-
after 2.0 is released, more RAM will be available for---- FORMANT SYNTHESIS!
-
one can fit 2 rows of text with this condensed alphabet.
-
go here: http://forums.synthstrom.com/discussion/240/motion-sequence-stutter-effect#latest
-
after careful consideration, I don't need an external formant filter. that would essentially apply the effect to everything coming out of the instrument. I only need it on one track at a time, and "bouncing" tracks for effect is a laborious and time…
-
how much?
-
I think with sampling is you can get 2 vowel sounds at best-- one sample fading into the other. with parallel filtering you can set the freq and reso for each step, which would yield a wider range of "formants"
-
Just bumping this for the new folks. AND another suggestion: 2 parallel band-pass filters with the standard per-note tweakability.
-
single cycle waveforms/ samples as LFO's
-
if you don't vote for it, I can't have it. AREN'T I WORTH IT?????
-
my biggest "hangup" with the current song-sections method (if you could call it that) is twofold A: the need to duplicate a pattern if you want it to repeat later in the song which necessitates more scrolling and searching (if the data already…
-
the whole sequencing interface should (logically) operate from left to right, with patterns displayed as a number of pads determined by the zoom level and length of the given pattern.
-
an updated song mode might help. What we have right now is more like a group-solo/mute. Instead of stopping the data from playing on any given track it silences the track when it moves to the next song section.
-
The timeline would scroll by 1 pad at any given zoom level-- holding shift while <> scrolling would scroll by 1 screen at a time at any given zoom level. NOTE--- current timeline runs top to bottom. Proposed timeline runs left to right with n…
-
OK-- here's my revised proposal (*and an apology to Ron for hijacking his thread-- but it inspired me!) AT the 16-level zoom, all 4 bar patterns (16 step) will appear as a solid color pad. Any pattern that is longer will appear as that many pads lo…
-
Ron-- I don't think it would necessarily do away with sections as they exist altogether. For instance, if you have two patterns based on the same instrument, if entered one into the timeline it could necessarily mute the other as long as the other w…
-
and "zig-zag" type playback of samples-- it plays front to back to front-- infinitely or for a numerically described amount. if the speed back and forth could be randomized by varying degrees-- in a logarithmic or linear fashion, it could yield a ty…